Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world.
Human tendency is always marked by acquisitiveness. A man always reforms only be questioning and analyzing more in any particular filed. Questing and analyzing are the two main reason which foster to the reformation of a man, a nation and in turn the world. Especially questioning the accepted wisdom makes a man to think deeper and ultimately understand the better world. Considering all the above facts, I totally agree with author's statement that for the better understatement of the world questioning the accepted wisdom plays an important role.
To corroborate the author's statement, there are numerous examples and great persons which and whom can be considered. Consider the great philosopher Plato. Plato is a philosopher and a thinker. He questioned the wrong fact what his progenitors believed that the earth is flat, and all the celestial bodies rotate around the earth who originally believed that the earth is rotating around another celestial object. This question made him think and analyze to such an extent that he eventually arrived at the conclusion that what their ancestors believed was proved to be false. With his thoughts several other facts revolved and several postulates and axioms were derived. Thus only due to his thought a rationality was brought among the people's thinking.
On the similar lines questioning and accepted wisdom can be applied in any field. To consider a simple example, a student asks question to the teacher after the training is completed. Only be questioning the student will come to know the solution, he understands the better part of the subject. Thus, questioning an accepted wisdom marks that the person is a radical thinker. And only by such thinking it is possible to advance the world.
Thus, in total we can say that the more we question, more better we are becoming which in turn advances the world. That is the amount of question asked is directly proportional to the depth of profoundness. Any person has to question an accepted wisdom and analyze the if's and but's. Then only a new and the better world will be espied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n important role. To corroborate the authors statement, there are numerous examples ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ral postulates and axioms were derived. Thus only due to his thought a rationality w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng it is possible to advance the world. Thus, in total we can say that the more ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...l we can say that the more we question, more better we are becoming which in turn advances ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04624277457 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79861328028 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505780346821 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2142793035 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1428571429 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4761904762 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424711029505 0.243740707755 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123339892651 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101308110014 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299469454035 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138766398144 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.