Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different slides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. after all, each and every question or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are multiple variables to a truth. even though some may adamantly believe after two centuries people will use the cars more than today, I strongly believe this opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, most cars will be parked after twenty years due to the following reasons and details.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that after twenty years most people will use public transportation and that can engender a myriad of advanatges. The main reason behind this rationale is that as we can see cities are being more crowded with advent of cars as well as the population was increased around large cities such as Newyork. Moreover, the government these days are looking for ways to reduce the crowd and traffic caused by cars and peoples. Therefore, some scientis beleive governments will force people to stop their cars also use the public transporation. To illustrate more thoroughly, my friend Jack he was working In Egypt to a transportaion company in which they are looking to ways to reduce the traffic in Cario. Altough, enhancing the public transportaion such as buses and trains would help, but people still used their cars even they are getting late to work. However, after 20 years the people believe it would be impractical to use the cars anymore becuase of the traffic and crowds. As a result, cars will parked and public transporation is gonna be used. All in all, we can't and shouldn't overlook the upsides of public transportaion after 20 years.
On top of this, after twenty years the world will be like a village. In the eyes of present day society, after twenty years people will start using internet to work instead of going to the offices. everything will be done on the internet for instance, contracts, trade, agreements. A great example of this would be my brother Ahmad works for a software company and he told me that they are working on softwares that called virtual reality. Furthermore, this software will enable people to dress in clothes that they want to buy when they are at homes. Long story short, it's clear as day to me people will stop using cars in the future.
In summation, yes, it's virtually impossible to provide a complete satisfying answer to an open-ended question. Although the jury may be out in this given essay, we can come to mutual agreement that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today due to the following reasons and details mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | King harald | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 63 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 76 | view |
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a ser 78
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first European to see one. In 1768 the animal became ext 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easil 70
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some paleontologists interpret the li 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...and cons before jumping to conclusions. after all, each and every question or topic r...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...here are multiple variables to a truth. even though some may adamantly believe after...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1073, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'park'
Suggestion: park
...ffic and crowds. As a result, cars will parked and public transporation is gonna be us...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1138, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ration is gonna be used. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of pu...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... gonna be used. All in all, we cant and shouldnt overlook the upsides of public transpor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Everything
...o work instead of going to the offices. everything will be done on the internet for instan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, after all, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86295503212 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54933304841 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509635974304 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6417935481 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319529971221 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100041215397 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906362658121 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211232318195 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386047158619 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.