Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
since the advent of 20th century, world has seen many discoveries in the field of transportation, which has made our life easier to live. however, a question arises that whether or not the current means of travelling will be available in future or not. Personally, I believe that the number of cars in future will only exponentially increase. I feel this way for 2 reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, as the time is progressing more and more countries are moving from developing to developed countries. The citizens of such regions are becoming wealthy and can afford the luxuries, like car. For instance, since the start of 21st century, two countries, India and China have changed their economies drastically. they both were successful in eradicating poverty and lifting people to middle class. As a result, citizens were able to buy the car for their convenience and increase the demand of vehicles in the market. this similar trend is also apparent in African countries, thus making people capable to buy the comforts of life. Hence, as time will proceed so does the demand of the cars.
Secondly, advancement in modern technology will only increase the car production as it would make maintaining the car much more cheaper. As a result, there is steady rise in demand of vehicles, however as they run on non-renewable sources of energy there demands could surge in near future. Yet, this problem can be overcome by the alternative of electric car which will again ascend the cars on roads. For instance, recently, since the oil wells of middle-east are draining there is a surge in car production which is shrinking the market. however, scientists have started finding methods to run the car by electricity. As a result, people around the world have become confident in buying the electricity driven cars as it would be much cheaper and more people would be buying for their comfort. Therefore, shift of fuel from petrol to electricity will increase the count of cars in future.
In conclusion, I believe that there would be appreciable count of the cars in future. this is because many countries are working to make their citizens rich and because the advancement of technology will make running a car more cheaper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
since the advent of 20th century, world has s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...which has made our life easier to live. however, a question arises that whether or not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...o live. however, a question arises that whether or not the current means of travelling will be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ve changed their economies drastically. they both were successful in eradicating pov...
^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e the demand of vehicles in the market. this similar trend is also apparent in Afric...
^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... it would make maintaining the car much more cheaper. As a result, there is steady rise in d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 542, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...oduction which is shrinking the market. however, scientists have started finding method...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 882, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tricity will increase the count of cars in future. In conclusion, I believe that the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 76, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... would be appreciable count of the cars in future. this is because many countries are wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ppreciable count of the cars in future. this is because many countries are working t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 224, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...t of technology will make running a car more cheaper.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96850393701 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7331645164 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498687664042 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3654133293 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.65 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125979681427 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043230617991 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330279136607 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828048070656 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264946853763 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.