Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding whether the cars would be less in use than today in twenty years, different people hold divergent opinions. Some would maintain the standpoint that this won't happen because people need cars to transport and enjoy travelling. I partly agree with their notion. However, from my opinion, I contend that it would be definitely fewer cars which are used in twenty years than today.
First, as the fast development of the whole society, people have come to realize the importance and necessary implementation of protecting environment. As the saying goes, protecting the environment is protecting ourselves and our generations in the future. Therefore more and more people tend to abandon the way taking cars and turn to more environmental friendly methods, like taking bikes. According to a survey conducted by Wuhan university in 2018 about the change of transportation ways among citizens, 61% of candidates have decreased their use of cars in the past ten years. Furthermore, 42% of citizens have turned to ride bikes or take subway for transportation in the past seven years. Thus it is visible that the use of cars would definitely reduce in twenty years through this trend.
Second, with the technology development and higher efficiency modern people require, using cars would not be the most convenient and efficient method. It is true that cars really bring us much convenience and efficiency in the past, however it is still criticized by many problems: air pollution, noise and time-consuming. Thus under no circumstance should we conclude that we will continue using cars as the main way of transportation, just like the process that human gave up taking horse carriage and invent the stem train for moving. What is likely happen in twenty years would be that we come to decrease the usage of cars because of some problems and turn to use more efficient and eco-friendly tools like airplane, trains or even some new tools we invented in the future.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that nowadays cars must be the most prevalent transportation tool all over the world, due to its low cost and convenience. Whereas it does not mean it would continue dominating in twenty years because of higher demand for transportation tools for people.
To sum up, whereas there is an argument that there would not be fewer cars in use than there are today in twenty years, namely its low cost and convenient, more eco-friendly tools humans need, coupled with higher efficiency for transportation tools people require makes a strong case for fewer cars in use than today in twenty years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lves and our generations in the future. Therefore more and more people tend to abandon th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...transportation in the past seven years. Thus it is visible that the use of cars woul...
^^^^
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ir pollution, noise and time-consuming. Thus under no circumstance should we conclud...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, really, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, even so, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08644859813 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83032854512 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507009345794 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7495040127 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.058823529 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237350069349 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849032233886 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777770375764 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154006902444 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802653141172 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.