Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teacher to be both popular (like by student) and effective in helping student in learning
their approach. The teachers' approach plays a vital role in every school. Some people believe that being papular and having an appropriate function in supporting the student to do their tasks is very difficult; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challenging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there is some numerous reason why teachers not only are popular but also have a great effect on a student's productivity.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point out is that having some characters like be popular and be effective in providing an apt ground for assisting their student in learning their lessons is one of the easy tasks for each teacher because those features have a direct connection with each other. For example, if some teacher is well-known among all of the students, their student would like to study their course exactly and completely. In fact, the teachers are capable of focusing on improving the condition of their students.
Second, the most persuasive point is that liking some teachers will have some benefits for students like paying attention to what their teacher is talking. In other words, it helps the teachers to have a kindly relationship with their students. To illustrate this point one needs only refer to some popular teachers in the class where some students like to take part in all of their class because of their teacher. Hance, having attention and concentrate cause progressing the students in their course.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that one of the easy tasks for each teacher, who is famous among student, is effective in the approach of their student related to their lessons. Therefore, having a lovely teacher lead to increasing reasonable student's function by doing their task correctly and paying attention adequately to their lesson.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
their approach. The teachers approach plays a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 496, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...pular but also have a great effect on a students productivity. In the beginning, the f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...le, if some teacher is well-known among all of the students, their student would like to s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r words, it helps the teachers to have a kindly relationship with their students....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03738317757 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65684787966 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507788161994 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.938485081 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 5.45110844103 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29270367164 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117457536661 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634756401421 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210014481013 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235137542519 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.