Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
As some people may hold a view that it is an important factor to make novel friends; however, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the main emphasis should put on the old friendships. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to perspective is that the preserving the friendship is more arduous than the making new friend. It is lucidly obvious that all human beings are categorized as the social creatures. One of the main goals of each individual in the society is having an extrovert connection with his/her surrounding. Moreover, all of the humankind have this ability to prepare links with others. As a result, making new friend will not be a complicated issue for any person. The main point which should keep the concentration at this moment is the ability to continue the relationships. Since, besides the social feature of the each person there are other characteristics such as power and self-dependency, which leads the person, considers himself as a unique person. This feeling of uniqueness paves the path to a vital difference between the people. Consequently, in this situation, it is important to keep your old friendships shaped couple years ago since it is more difficult than making the new one.
The second reason is that the old friends have a better and lucid understanding of each other. It is explicit as a crystal that as more duration you spend with together, you gain deep understanding from your partner. This situation paves the path to cogent and a complicated connection between the two parts of the relationship. In addition, the human being is seriously eager to find a counterpart for him or herself to complete his or her failures. According to the noteworthy survey conducted in my country, approximately the ninety-six percent of couple in Tehran who spend their life together for more than ten years together, can explicitly list their partners aims and fears, and they have very simple type of communication beyond the ordinary speaking, while they get informed about their partner feeling just by his or her facial gesture.
The last reason which confirms the accuracy of viewpoint is that the old friendships have more in common aspects. A successful relationship is a connection shaped based on the common features, inasmuch as this similarities outcome as an additional strength to both sides of the connection, and this condition promotes both sides' statues. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject is my own example. I have a friend for more than six years and we are aware of each other’s positive and negative feature. Besides, we share lots of activities which impel us to share approximately identical perspective and thought. Thus, we work as a company with to gather and we are able to cover each other drawbacks and enhance each other’s position.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned reasons one can logically draw the conclusion that preserving the old friendships is more important than the making the new ones. Since continuing the links is difficult, old friendships have the better understanding of each other, and they are more likely to be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ion with his/her surrounding. Moreover, all of the humankind have this ability to prepare ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'similarities'' or 'similarity's'?
Suggestion: similarities'; similarity's
...n the common features, inasmuch as this similarities outcome as an additional strength to bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203642384106 0.229887763892 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.14238410596 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117549668874 0.0866891130778 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.044701986755 0.046263068375 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0562913907285 0.0685040099705 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115894039735 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0298013245033 0.0351676179071 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.943714437 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0298013245033 0.0309702414327 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00331125827815 0.00188951952338 175% => OK
Determiners: 0.14238410596 0.0887237588012 160% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0149006622517 0.0209618222197 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0132450331126 0.0139019557991 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3357.0 2387.08602151 141% => OK
No of words: 556.0 408.028673835 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03776978417 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345323741007 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267985611511 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201438848921 0.174417080927 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14928057554 0.112833075102 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.943714437 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501798561151 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 61.0447051826 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.24 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8349054691 48.84282405 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.28 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.24 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.56 0.644075263715 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 49.0385611511 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.43537414966 1.45489161554 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367132925968 0.300154397459 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0763456205224 0.103427244359 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0538595031155 0.0752933317313 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502424897497 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15189397665 0.151897553556 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137451834092 0.114077575197 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805167223222 0.0781384742642 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.447441549709 0.336927656856 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0341518580926 0.067059652881 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254535823943 0.210909579961 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499672311658 0.0618886996521 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.