tpo9
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the benefits of Fuel-cell engines. While the reading passage lists some advantages such as the abundance of Hydrogen, the less carbon dioxide emission, and the low price as the merits of this kind of engine in comparison to the internal-combustion engine, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the lecturer refutes the ease availability of the Hydrogen, which in the reading part is named as one of the advantages of this engine. As the professor states; although the Hydrogen is fluent in the environment, it is the part of the chemical composition and a specific technology is required to drive this element. In addition, all of this process are artifice and complicated.
Next, the text and lecturer possess a disjunction about the less carbon dioxide emission. While, the passage surmises the byproduct of hydrogen is water which is harmless to the surrounding, the professor rebuts this fact. As he asserts, although its byproduct does have no any side-effect in the environment, the process of purification demanded the production of hydrogen is harmful. Based on his information, this kind of engine requires the pure hydrogen; moreover, this pure element prepares with the sophisticated machine which worked with the coal and oil. Consequently, the usage of this fuel does not pollute the surrounding; however, its preparation has a significant negative effect on the environment.
Finally, the professor argues that this engine possesses less cost. Meanwhile, in the passage presumes that this engine burns less fuel for an identical distance which the internal-combustion engine burns. The lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he mentions this engine works with a unique element which helps the hydrogen to burn. In addition, this element is too expensive. Thus, the engine can save the fuel for the long route; on the other hand, its mechanism is not cheap.
That is how the lecturer effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...serts, although its byproduct does have no any side-effect in the environment, the...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...although its byproduct does have no any side-effect in the environment, the process of puri...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt, the process of purification demanded the production of hydrogen is harmful. B...
^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he mentions this engine works with a un...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290909090909 0.261695866417 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.114285714286 0.158904122519 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0623376623377 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0285714285714 0.0435111971325 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0181818181818 0.0277247811725 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127272727273 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0155844155844 0.0370669169778 42% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.98821446092 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.012987012987 0.0208969081088 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.194805194805 0.128158765124 152% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0025974025974 0.0158828679856 16% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155844155844 0.0114777025283 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2134.0 1645.83664459 130% => OK
No of words: 343.0 271.125827815 127% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22157434402 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376093294461 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30612244898 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.247813411079 0.187439937562 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137026239067 0.113142543107 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98821446092 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501457725948 0.539623497131 93% => OK
Word variations: 52.2376214409 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1764705882 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0260890955 49.3711431718 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.529411765 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.7887154862 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.6935483871 1.90840788429 141% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146654156647 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.107442397459 0.0787303798458 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.644814655686 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192036964824 0.139662658121 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.587392711224 0.414875509568 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0991577771942 0.0530846634433 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.