Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
It goes without saying that, in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, internet is one of the most essential elements in everybody's life. In my opinion, it is very important for governments to spent money to improve internet access rather than improving poblic transportation. In what follow, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substatiate my viewpoint.
First of all, nowadays, every aspect of our life is dependant on the internet, transportation is one of the aspects. Most of the Metro and bus tickets are issued online and even ticket machines in the stations need an internet access inorder to perform transactions and sell the tickets. As a result, internet access have a higher priority comparing to the public transportation itself. My experience demonstrates this idea. Three month ago, I was in my way to the university and I was in a hurry. However, when I reached the Metro station the internet of that place had disconnected and all of the trains and tickets machines were halted and none of the trains moved until the internet connected again. Had government promoted the internet access, transportation system would not have faced a problem.
Moreover, most of the families have at leats one car in their houses, which makes them needless of public transportation. Procedures in the car factories are now easier, due to the automation of factories and the help of internet acces to control them online via computer networks. This leads to higher output in the companies and lower prices for consumers. When number of cars are higher, people tend to use their cars instead of public transportation. However, without internet access, everybody gets in trouble, since everything is working online and is dependant on the internet. For instance, my familiy have three car, which means one car for every member of our family of three. We usually use our car for our travels and transportation, since it is more convenient that public transportations. That is why public transportations shouldn't be the main priority and concern of the government.
To conclude, I firmly believe that improved and widespread internet access is more important than developed public transportation. This is due to the fact that not only busses and trains are dependant on the internet at first but also there are less need and concern for public transportation than the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
..., nowadays, every aspect of our life is dependant on the internet, transportation is one ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rnet of that place had disconnected and all of the trains and tickets machines were halted...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 559, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...nce everything is working online and is dependant on the internet. For instance, my famil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 622, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'car' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cars'.
Suggestion: cars
...et. For instance, my familiy have three car, which means one car for every member o...
^^^
Line 9, column 839, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ons. That is why public transportations shouldnt be the main priority and concern of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 192, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...act that not only busses and trains are dependant on the internet at first but also there...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1269035533 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01409590928 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505076142132 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5709489398 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288254518829 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916543813787 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111164052877 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207606167062 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881724810959 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.