Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People*s preference may differ when it comes to decide whether government should invest more money on Internet access than public transportation. But when people are asked about this topic, I bet a lot of people would not agree that governments should place more emphasis to improve Internet access than public transportation. In my opinion, I believe that public transportation makes more sense because it is directly related to infrastructure, traffic policy and society satisfaction.
To begin with, it is widely believed that public transportation plays an important role in infrastructure and city planning process. Before they are providing us public transportation, they should build enough road or trail which public transportation could be easily built on it. All city mayor put an emphasis on how to improve the way of transportation, which transportation people usually prefer to travel, which one bring huge benefits to the society. By way of example, I can recall my city, Ulaanbaatar, which is capital city of Mongolia has enormous amount of issues corresponding to the public transportation. There is heavy traffic jam, but they still could not take action to this, and people want them to build new way of modern transportation such as metro or plenty public buses. It is really annoying that the government did not invest as much as money on improving on public transportation.
In addition to the infrastructure development, there is no doubt that after government offering us enough public buses or metros, they should organize efficient traffic policy which could easily adapt to public transportation and facilitate our way to home or work. For instance, because of worse-qualified city plan, people are suffering from this issue in my city, Ulaanbaatar. The government did not predict that how many people might move to capital city from countryside. As a result, crowded street and heavy traffic jam have been become as issue. Government have a right to invest money to the devastated sector and it is really necessary to put attention into public transportation in order to facilitate our traffic and make citizens satisfied.
Finally, I do not think it is necessarily fair to claim that Internet access is less important just because of public transportation makes more sense. Internet access gives people a great opportunity to get educated, find wide variety of information and useful tool for students who do their assignment based on international research. No body argues that Internet brought enormous aspect on the way we see the world and suggest a great opportunity to keep pace with high developing technological evolutions.
From what I discussed so far, I can draw conclusion that government should lay more emphasis on improving public transportation which includes infrastructure, right traffic policy, plenty buses or metro carrying a lot of passengers. But it does not necessarily mean that Internet access is not useful. I have a strong belief that Internet access does not require huge amount of investment in order to improve the quality compared to public transportation which provides many possibilities to citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 566, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...m have been become as issue. Government have a right to invest money to the devastat...
^^^^
Line 9, column 566, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...m have been become as issue. Government have a right to invest money to the devastat...
^^^^
Line 13, column 337, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobody'?
Suggestion: Nobody
...gnment based on international research. No body argues that Internet brought enormous a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, really, so, still, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 8.0752688172 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2684.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34661354582 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18486028366 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488047808765 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9661078263 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260625999923 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897728187113 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667282257652 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161092666199 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558561446673 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.