Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a debate among people on whether spending money to improve internet access is more important than improving public transportation for governments. In my opinion, government should spend money to improve public transportation, and it is more vital rather than improving internet access. that is due to, making better and expanding the public transportation will decrease the air pollution. furthermore, in term of long-term goals it is economically more efficient. I will delve into the most important reasons of mine in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, it is very essential for government to care about the environment and allocate money, and enough budget to expanding the public transportation to decrease the air pollution. Alternatively stated, investing money in public transportation, is an environmental friendly action, which government should take into consideration. In this way, government can provide a condition for cities and settlements to have less air pollution. therefore, government can benefit from such program in many aspects. For instance, in a city where public transportation have been expanded properly, people frequently use more public transportation for daily commuting. therefore, the city will have more clean days in a year. Accordingly, people do not get sick because of air pollution, and they are healthier. On top of all that our environment will be protected and remained clean.
Second, in a long-term period, spending money in public transportation will be financially efficient for government. Consequently, we should see it as a beneficial investment. In other words, allocating some money to expand public transportation will pay for itself in a near future. Thus, the government can make great profit from such investment. For example, by spending money once on propagating public transportation, we are able to benefit from its results in peoples’ health, spending less time in traffic, have a less stressful environment, and not importing gasoline. therefore, we can save the government money by this way, and spend it for expanding our infrastructure.
Based on aforementioned reasons, it can be concluded that government should allocate money to improve and expanding public transportation, and it is more crucial than improving internet access. that is because, we can protect the environment and have less air pollution. furthermore, this is better for the economic of the city, and it is like an investment that we can profit from it in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... rather than improving internet access. that is due to, making better and expanding ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...tation will decrease the air pollution. furthermore, in term of long-term goals it is econo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...settlements to have less air pollution. therefore, government can benefit from such progr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...lic transportation for daily commuting. therefore, the city will have more clean days in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 583, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...nvironment, and not importing gasoline. therefore, we can save the government money by th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...crucial than improving internet access. that is because, we can protect the environm...
^^^^
Line 13, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...nvironment and have less air pollution. furthermore, this is better for the economic of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 8.0752688172 433% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51538461538 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35701743739 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5140040253 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7727272727 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316272220018 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101817110903 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115338321265 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232142197049 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103415635867 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.