Compared to the last decades, the life conditions was boosted in each civilisated society and every generation tasted better life quality compared the older one. Some people may hold the view that every generations added one step for next one in order to increase life standard. However, others refutes it and say it is fallacy. From my vantage point, I concur with former group and the lines will shed light on my viewpoint.
First exquisite point to mentioned is that the importance of computers. There is no need to say that computers make our life easier than past. We communicate with people who live overseas countries in a minute. People make complex calculatoins and statistical modelling by the help of them. Furthermore, workers spend much more time for families or special interests. A vivid example which can given to the subject is one of my own experience. I cannot remember memories with my father from my childhood since he used to work for longh hours in his company. Consequently, comptuers allow new generations to have better life.
In approaching this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is a subtle point which borne in mind. It goes without saying that people nutrute better today's world. The quality and available of foods increased capacity of humans brain.
A noteworthy refreshingly intelligent statistics revealed by a recent research which conducted at MIT University in the USA shows that the IQ of young people is higher than their grandparents even parents. The research has conducted between four different elementray school in order to eleminate standard error. As a result, the research shows new generation has better life qualitiy which
To wrap up once can conclude and cannot deny that we have better life than our parents. The new inventions played vital roled in it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce of computers. There is no need to say that computers make our life easier than...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'give' or 'be given'?
Suggestion: give; be given
...al interests. A vivid example which can given to the subject is one of my own experie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from my childhood since he used to work for longh hours in his company. Conseque...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08637873754 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69229698236 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6297491114 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5789473684 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979992373565 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263702252207 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266376346423 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496171137995 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222626266724 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.