Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Progress is always good. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The progress of humanity in scientific and technological fields is remarkable and has improved by multiple ways our life by eliminating barriers and limits that used to make human life harsh. However, I do think that progress is not always good if it is accompanied by prudence and ethical principles. In this essay, some reasons supporting that progress is not always good will be discussed.
To begin with, meanwhile in the developed countries the human life is enough prosperous characterized by socio-political stability, there are many areas of the world that are still suffering from famine, political repressions, and civil wars. This phenomenon might have its roots that the developed countries where progress took place take profit by using the less powerful ones. The wealth and advanced life standards provided by human progress are not equally distributed among the world. On contrary, the strong ones become blind and arrogant due to the power offered by the progress occurred in their country. It could be said that the human progress resulted in the creation of two worlds, one of the powerful countries and the other of the weak ones.
Furthermore, even if progress is remarked in sciences and technology humans are constantly losing their ‘’humanity’’. Ethical rules are considered to be modest and out of date and people are getting adjusted to a life without morality and ethics usually promoted through technological advances such as advertisements in television or web. Interpersonal relationships have been eroded and feeling of love for fellow-men is substituted by selfishness and egoism. The stressful daily routine might be the main cause of this situation because in the framework of the progressed society individuals have daily to deal with a plenty of issues. Thus, there is not free time and space to care for others. The educational system may contribute to the creations of emotion-free people without a high sense of moral and ethical rules and just focusing on providing sterile knowledge in order to keep up with the progress of technology and sciences.
To sum up, taking into account all things have been spoken above it could be concluded that even if the human race has done a significant progress regarding the world of matter people failed to be better humans.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, thus, while, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.224 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20205489577 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6133886718 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140084173704 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540105571917 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630771970152 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939796859802 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799369853965 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.