When people do few things well, they are likely to attribute their failure to their busy time with lots of things to do. However, from my point of view, though busy is part of reason to do some things bad, more reasons weigh much heavier when blamed for their defeat.
Admittedly, there is no doubt that, when people are busy, in all likelihood they will make faults. Physically, people are busy with various things will have less time to relax themselves. Meanwhile, tiredness may contribute to their erroneous behaviors and carelessness. Also, with no time to review and check out is another reason that may lead to errors. For instance, once I had an internship working with accounting sheets to calculate the salaries of employees when I was also prepared with my final exams every evening at that time. With no time to check the accuracy of sheets I made faults then. Therefore being busy with considerable amount of events, one are probable in failure then. However, although people might make mistakes, it does not mean that all the people who are busy will do few things well.
First and foremost, with careful preparation and a flexible schedule, people can be both busy and successful on all things. If individuals make a perfect preparation before they might be busy and also set up a time schedule which is suitable with everything they need to pay attention to, they are able to be well-organized and do all of urgent things well. Take Ma Yun, the CEO of the biggest E-commercial company Arababa in China, once said that, the well-organized and tight time table and to acquire useful network and capabilities are the two essential habits for him to pass through the arduous time with plenty of discrepant issues to deal with when he start his own business. On account of His experience-doing few thing bad at that time, he finally became successful later on. Also, different people have their own approaches to release the spiritual and physical pressure during the busy time, such as entertaining, doing exercise, or sleeping. Indeed,
The second reason why I disagree with the assertion is that people who are always busy are people who are talented; talented people are unlikely to do few things well. It is common at the workplace or school that, people who are well-rounded and dominated are the people who are charge with more jobs or tasks. It means that they have the abilities to do things well in many aspects. Also, if they cannot do most of their missions well, they won't be put on such huge workload, because their leaders, in practice, do not believe in them anymore due to their bad performance.
All in all, though busy sometimes cause mistakes, because of the perfect preparation, the schedule and their comprehensive capabilities, they won't do few things well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... accuracy of sheets I made faults then. Therefore being busy with considerable amount of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 661, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'starts'.
Suggestion: starts
... discrepant issues to deal with when he start his own business. On account of His exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 963, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, doing exercise, or sleeping. Indeed, The second reason why I disagree with th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ll-rounded and dominated are the people who are charge with more jobs or tasks. It mean...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87029288703 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65073246318 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7676290625 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365251466547 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132181695092 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921321673658 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247592666758 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623291389036 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.