Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the progress of technology, the importance of education has become clear to the community. It is incontrovertibly axiomatic that an individual can ensure his future as a successful person with studying at a high-ranked university. When it comes to this point, most of the people of society think that the value of the teachers who plays a significant role in this community has increased. I, on the other hand, believe that they are less appreciated in comparison to the past. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will elaborate in the following essay.
First and foremost, most valued people of society are people who live in the aristocracy level. This group of the community gains a large amount of money every month, and it is crystal clear that teachers are not in this group. As a matter of fact, teachers in the past had a high income, and they were getting paid more than most of the other employees, like people who worked in banks, institutions, factories, to name but a few. On the other hand, the other employees' salary has increased dramatically in comparison to the teachers, so the teacher's living condition has declined over the past few years. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, they earn less money in comparison to other employees, so their social value has decreased since the social value is closely related to the financial condition. For example, professors, politicians, actors, to name but a few are among the most valued people of the society because they make a hoard of money. In contrast, people who have a lot of financial problems are not considered as successful people. As a consequence, other people do not appreciate them.
As a second noteworthy point of view to mention about this job is that being a teacher has become more comfortable these days. To be more specific, in the past, students had to study very hard to get accepted as a teacher, but nowadays, students who could not get accepted in other universities try to become a teacher. Educated people are among the most valued people in society, and teachers are not appreciated because they have limited knowledge. For instance, my father is a retired teacher. While he studied very hard to become a teacher, my brother is not interested in studying whatsoever, and now he is accepted as a teacher in one of the best schools in our hometown. It is worth mentioning that most of the educated people study engineering or medicine in university, and did they not accepted in these fields; their second chance is to become a teacher.
By way of conclusion, the analysis of the aforementioned idea brings us to the point that the value of teachers has decreased gradually in recent years. This is because not only has their income has not increased like other jobs but also less educated people can become teacher nowadays in comparison to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...but a few. On the other hand, the other employees salary has increased dramatically in co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e, other people do not appreciate them. As a second noteworthy point of view to me...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in contrast, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78744939271 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80473093113 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449392712551 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6991046221 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.619047619 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5238095238 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195971165763 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622409580583 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362417605028 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120390437392 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212822105865 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.