Nowadays, with considering the rapid changes in communities, some individuals claim that teachers' efficiency declined moderately that they are less valued and acclaimed than they were in the past. Others, refute this viewpoint. I, personally, agree with the first group and believe that today, teachers are less appreciated. The two conspicuous reasons to support my idea are elaborated as follows.
To begin with, the number of knowledgeable people were much fewer in the past, which directly has an effect on the importance of teaching. As reveals by ancient novels, most individuals could not even able to read a basic book. Therefore, individuals used to respect the one who could teach them to read and write a lot. An example can shed some light on this subject. None of my grandmothers and grandfathers used to read a book, for they could not.
Moreover, people were much more dependent on teachers, for assistance equipment were not varied. Nowadays, every youth has a lot of learning assistance tools, which help them to learn new thing in any area. Also, people can easily search on the internet to watch and read about new things. One of my memories can drive this notion dramatically home. I used to go to the math class when I was an eighteen-year-old girl. Although I had to stop it because of tuition fees, I had the second option and tried to learn via related websites. Therefore, it depicts the decline in students' dependency on teachers.
All in all, there are several remarkable reasons to be persuasive enough to accept the fact that societies do not appreciate teachers as much as before. I, totally, support this viewpoint in the two previous in details.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ommunities, some individuals claim that teachers efficiency declined moderately that the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed to read a book, for they could not. Moreover, people were much more dependen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, second, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96113074205 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81786999605 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5277277097 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222519510412 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533068722607 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703479287661 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133087888602 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801502299598 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.