Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where people are putting all their efforts to have get more information and be in a right line, knowing political and social information is a rational task. One of the most contentious issues having been brought up recently is whether teachers should state their social and political outlooks to their students or not. Some people strongly hold the view that this would be so deleterious and students should not be informed about these issues. However, the majority of people look at this concept through a different lens. As a matter of fact, I subscribe to the view of those people. In the subsequent paragraphs I will delve into some conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my perspective.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that getting familiar children and adults with what happens around them is a critical issue which deserves a well-organized considerations. Generally the best organization that should be in charge is schools and teachers. Teachers can give them copious information that make them be more meticulous about events in their society and. To illustrate, take a teacher as an example who constantly talks about the election that is going to be happen in near future. It leads them to have a better insight into the voting process. Subsequently, they can vote more carefully.
Another subtle point which deserves some words here is that talking more in the class can make an outline for students’ future. They get more information about lots of field and it enhances their chances to select better job for future. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligent statistical data revealed in our country, indicates that over 90 percent of employees in well-known companies, chose their field of work when they were at school class and their teacher’s speech inspired them to keep on this way.
To put it briefly, contemplating all reasons and factors, one soon realizes that teacher not only rise students’ knowledge about their society but also they intrigue them to choice their best selection for their future jobs. Consequently, I firmly recommend that teachers inform students more social an political knowledge at class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...e are putting all their efforts to have get more information and be in a right line...
^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consideration'?
Suggestion: consideration
...l issue which deserves a well-organized considerations. Generally the best organization that s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of fields'.
Suggestion: lots of fields
...future. They get more information about lots of field and it enhances their chances to select...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...at teachers inform students more social an political knowledge at class.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, well, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18888888889 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89630991282 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8209267936 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.882352941 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187296959549 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585575322895 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481055020346 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120472815734 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413838600624 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.