Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
When it comes to the issue of teacher’s social and political view should not be show in the classroom, some people may agree with this statement and give us sound reasons for their beliefs. On the other hand, some other people might disagree with this idea and have different opinions. Also, those opponents could provide us with strong purposes to support their thought. I believe that the teachers should not make their social and political views known to the students in the classroom because there are so many reasons supports my point of view. This short essay will demonstrate some points regarding this issue in the following paragraph:
First of all, in my opinion, it is widely understood that the teachers should not make their social and political views known to the student in the class room. The teachers have great impact on the students thought. So, the teachers should be a good models to all of the students regardless to the their social and political thoughts or beliefs.
Another reason why I advocate the attitude of the teachers should not show their social and political in the classroom. The students come to school for specific reason which is learning new things. When the teachers make their social and political view known by the students this will effect on their way of teaching and eventually, the students will concentrate on un useful things instead of focusing on their goal.
Finally , it is a well-established fact that talking about political and social things will separate people to different group. And this will effect on the students relationship instead of learning students how to evaluate the people according to their ethics.
From what has been discussed above, we may draw a conclusion that says, people who hold opposite idea may have the right to believe in that, but my opinion and other people’s opinions are overwhelmingly too much to be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the teachers should be a good models to all of the students regardless to the their social...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ls to all of the students regardless to the their social and political thoughts or belief...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...al view known by the students this will effect on their way of teaching and eventually...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ad of focusing on their goal. Finally , it is a well-established fact that talk...
^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...eople to different group. And this will effect on the students relationship instead of...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rent group. And this will effect on the students relationship instead of learning studen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, so, well, talking about, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0407523511 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60970993359 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489028213166 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4051440514 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460134018559 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177391347213 0.076458572812 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127557512091 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247666156495 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159028399008 0.0645574589148 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.