There is no shortage of debate about whether it is more advantageous to have new friends or to maintain our relationship with the old ones. Despite knowing new people is sometimes exciting from the perspective of discovering new characters and ideas, I think it is better to stick with the old friends.
First of all, it is clear that the old friendships are irreplaceable. With the complexity of the modern life and the dangers that surround us, it is extremely hard to build confident relationships. People now are looking for their needs more than before. The relation between people is related with their needs to each other. We can't easily give our secret to new people. In contrast, old friends are the most trusted people where we can share everything. My life is a compelling example. While my relationship with new people is very limited and I rely so much on my old friends, my young sister is making always new friends and every time we meet she is upset about one of them, she critiques their behaviour and she always say that they are not worth her trust and care.
Second, the memories carried by the old friends are a real treasure, those people who share with you unforgettable moment, your first kiss, your first party, your biggest problem in primary school. They carry with them a part of our life, and as we live ones this is the most important for us. In addition even when we have new friends, they really can't understand us in the bad moment, they can't see what we really need, because simply they don't really know who we really are. For instance, when I have problems in the university, my colleges can't understand my feeling, however talking with my old friends, even when distances separate us, hearing them just make me relax and ready to solve my life issues.
To assume, I strongly believe that it is more important to maintain our relationships with a long period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ated with their needs to each other. We cant easily give our secret to new people. I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...s this is the most important for us. In addition even when we have new friends, they rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n when we have new friends, they really cant understand us in the bad moment, they c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t understand us in the bad moment, they cant see what we really need, because simply...
^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hat we really need, because simply they dont really know who we really are. For inst...
^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...problems in the university, my colleges cant understand my feeling, however talking ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, really, second, so, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68955223881 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5559038013 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540298507463 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9261274535 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21972573165 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838905566093 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053700319853 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164552042316 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384874601368 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.