Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In life, people are like to travel to different places, sometimes they go with their families and sometimes with friends for different purposes. Some people are going for a tour for entertainment and others are travel as an educational tour. Despite the purpose of the tour, here the question is, did the tour guide is really important, while going for a group tour? some people believe, it is not necessary to take a guide, because it is easy to manage with technology. On the other hands, I personally believe, it is always better to take a travel guide while going for a tour for reasons I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, although it is an extra financial burden, they always save our time. when we go for a trip along with a guide they are helpful to reach the destination at the right time, as a result, we have extra time to spend at the location. my university college tour is the best example to explain this. When I was studying health informatics at the University of Findlay, the department was conducted an educational tour to central Washington hospital. Since the distance is too long, the professor appointed a guide for help. Initially, we thought that it is an extra burden. But, he saved a lot of time, especially while designing the route map. We thought that was almost three hundred miles distance, but he choose a different direction, as a result, we save almost a hundred miles distance.
In addition to that, since the people more familiar with that site, they play a vital role in the illustration of the place. When we go for a tour, especially historical places, we really need a guide to explore the history of that place. In contrast, if we don’t have a mentor, we might miss the opportunity to learn important information. My friend Alex is a good example of this. Last he went to London and he got a chance to visit the London museum. He went there and saw the ancient history of the tools. However, while he doesn’t have a guide, he was felt that those are just stones and rocks. This example clearly explains the importance of the tour guide.
In conclusion, even though we need to spend some extra money for them, it is better to consider a guide while going for the trip. Because they support us while traveling and help us to explore the knowledge of the tore site.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...mportant, while going for a group tour? some people believe, it is not necessary to ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...cial burden, they always save our time. when we go for a trip along with a guide the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...ve extra time to spend at the location. my university college tour is the best exa...
^^
Line 2, column 717, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...st three hundred miles distance, but he choose a different direction, as a result, we ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58851674641 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58455152697 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476076555024 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 14.0 3.51792114695 398% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7204542337 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3913043478 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130627423289 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439377150511 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458531626857 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787710820165 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461488746986 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.