A favorable team work is critical to group project. Communication is definitely essential when it comes to integration and coroperation. There are many ways to communicating successfully. Among them, I strongly agree that we should communicate in person rather than by e-mail.
Efficiency is absolutely critical, but e-mail takes time. Writing e-mail might be conducive in some cases, such as providing piles of information or making a list to record things down. However, it takes much more time than simply telling others. Not only the sender needs to spend time writing, but also the receivers should remember to check their mail boxes. It also requires extra effort to confirm if all the members have gotten the mails.
Explanation often requires elements beyond words. I had been the head of one music project in class. I always insisted communicating with others in person. Even if we were not able to do so, I would talk to them through cell phones or Skype. The reason was simple: it was easier and more effective to discuss with them through our own voices. The melody, the arrangement, and those creative ideas--we definitely needed our body language, our voice, and our facial expressions to explain our thoughts precisely .
Extraordinary ideas often stem from the noisy moment when members discuss verbally. Psychologists suggest that when ideas are spreading with one another, they are more possible to be integrated into a new one that is better than any others. While many innovative inventions result from accidents, there are a great number of outstanding work originated from communicating face to face.
Verbal communication makes team work more efficient, helps with effective explanation, and most importantly is instrumental to the birth of extraordinary ideas. It is absolutely better than online communication through e-mails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ssions to explain our thoughts precisely . Extraordinary ideas often stem from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33673469388 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95007972957 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1808626755 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.45 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173908320092 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513135234285 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406209737856 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974479442082 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506819283205 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.