Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
when teacher assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Try as some individuals might to work separately well for class assignments, students would work more efficiently when they are asked to submit their assignments in group accompanied by their other classmates. I strongly agree with the concept that impose the children to work relatively proper with their counterparts as to fulfill their projects since they can learn from others' errors, they can be exposed to distinct approaches and they will be able to overcome more assignments with more pace.
First and for most, approaches of this kind would bring about the opportunity to recognize the errors from each other. That is to say, children by noticing the wrong results of a problem would pursue each of the individual's error which will be a great chance for them not to repeat that fault. Needless to say, it doesn't matter which one of the student has done such foul, the important part is the way that student could benefit from it by first noticing it, second correcting it and then preventing it to happens in future. That is why, that learning from others seems a lot conducive to our education.
Equally important is that, students would be more apt to experience different ideas and avenues correlated to a problem or dilemma. Every person in a group, possess distinguishable aptitudes as an individual. Thereby, each one can provides one solution to conquer the problem. Nonetheless, it might trigger to a controversy within the group, the advantages outweigh that controversy and finding new ways and different approaches of fulfilling the project's requirement would be appealing for students.
Last but not least, by asking students to submit a project in a group instead of individually, teachers can assume their learning more hastily. Not only would they boost their rates in homework, they can expect them to submit more projects too. In a group, students can work with a higher pace and therefore they can fulfill more projects. In this way, with more projects they can presume their learning to flourish more than any other way of submitting a project.
In conclusion, I recognize working in a group more profitable for students owing to aforementioned reasons. From my vantage point, by evaluating and validating the pros and cons of studying separately there seem no practical aspect of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...s of a problem would pursue each of the individuals error which will be a great chance for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... repeat that fault. Needless to say, it doesnt matter which one of the student has don...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ng it and then preventing it to happens in future. That is why, that learning from others...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ems a lot conducive to our education. Equally important is that, students would be mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...as an individual. Thereby, each one can provides one solution to conquer the problem. No...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
... different approaches of fulfilling the projects requirement would be appealing for stud...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...any other way of submitting a project. In conclusion, I recognize working in a gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05483028721 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80371074196 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516971279373 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1587873414 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25052238975 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085644718662 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781765442253 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136855081428 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915685584293 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.