Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The question is whether the students are much more effective on their work, when they work together or when they work alone. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint may support a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that working in a group for a particular assignment it's more effective. While, others have a conviction that it's better working alone. I am unanimous with the former group because in my view, it is not only beneficial but entertaining as well. I will vastly make clear my vantage point through two salient reasons.
To begin with, the first and most important reason is that students work in a group are more flexible and quick in their reaction toward different problems that they may have to solve. They are able to come up with better ideas for their assignments. Therefore, their creativity reaches the highest level. If happens that one student do not have any idea for that assignment, someone else might be able to present one and everybody can work to analyse that in order to reach a good solution. Even though, most students prefer to be alone because they want the credit of the work to be theirs. Still it is not guaranteed that they are going to come up with good ideas. The recent research has shown that people how work in a group have better results in their work than students who worked alone. Because of this, I believe that working in a group is more valuable.
Furthermore, another reason that should be considered is that students can develop their ability to become more socialized by learning how to work in group, how to communicate and how to share their knowledge with others. To explain this, take my example. When I was in university, I was member of a popular group of my generation and all of us were very outgoing students. We were good students too. We knew how to help others. None of us were shy or had these kinds of complexity in our character. That's why, I think that working in group makes students to learn how to help others.
To sum up, I strongly believe that working in a group helps students to develop their character and learn more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rticular assignment its more effective. While, others have a conviction that its bett...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 594, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...nt the credit of the work to be theirs. Still it is not guaranteed that they are goin...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 501, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e kinds of complexity in our character. Thats why, I think that working in group make...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...why, I think that working in group makes students to learn how to help others. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, as for, i think, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67819148936 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46874847789 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51329787234 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.667239814 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9545454545 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.