Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
I am absolutely disagreed. Team projects could be effective at the academic levels and, at the school levels, not only are not a useful way to teach, but also are too destructive. Moreover, the emotional and spiritual properties of the students are not ready to undergo other pearson in a team; On the better word, the culture of the team work has not been entrenched in their mindsets. There are several reasons to support my opinion as follows:
All students do not have the same intelligences which leads to some problems. An unequal work dividing is a crucial objection that question the efficiency of this kind of projects. The more talented student would accept the majority part of the assignment, whereas, other students would handle less tasks in comprison with the clever student. I mean, the good students would get better than the past and in contrast, the weak students would get weaker. So, the main objective of team projects that has been mentioned raising the quality of learning, in this way, it would not happen.
Educating at the schools levels, does not demand such assignments. There are no any research aims at those level which have been determined by the ministry. Working in groups and contracting with the counterparts is suitable for who is studing at universities. Needless to say, schools' students are to learn very basic subjects, without expanding them. Imposing such higher grade assignment can affect the students badly from psychological viewpoints. According to my experiences at high school, team projects cause some confilicts among friends and could reduce the learning quality.
Of course, there might be some benefits underneath of these projects. For instance, weak students could take other students as exemplary to boost thier skills; Dealing with different ideas and the ability of unifying the groupare other skills which could be gained by team works. However, I think the bad consequences of this issue are more than its profits. Social contracting skills' role in the students' life is indispensable but, they would learn them in playing.
All in all, I am strongly disagreed with that statement. Were it not for these kind of projects, many students would learn the subjects better; Because, teacher isn charge of their education and a trained teacher teaches better than it that a team projects do.
- Why go to university? 3
- Some people argue that technological progress is always positive. Others dispute this. What is your view and why? 88
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 86
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun tasks is countable.
...t, whereas, other students would handle less tasks in comprison with the clever stud...
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
... not demand such assignments. There are no any research aims at those level which ...
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
.... Social contracting skills role in the students life is indispensable but, they would l...
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ed with that statement. Were it not for these kind of projects, many students would learn ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, i mean, i think, in contrast, kind of, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0932642487 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68172133256 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569948186528 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2949033877 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274826848468 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739854328478 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451468843779 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152750614386 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489943802777 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.