TPO 43
Agnostids are known as a primitive species which are related to the modern insects. There are some hypothesises about how they have lived:
1) They were free-swimming predators which was feeding from plenty of smaller organisms in the ocean. The objection is that ocean predators should have large and developed eyes to help them in chasing preys; In contrast, Agnostids have not had large eyes; So they are suposed to take advantages of other sensory facilities for recognizing their preys; But, there is no any evidence to support the exsitance of other sensory organs in their body.
2) It is possible that they were seefloor dwellers and they would have survived by scavenging dead organisms or by grazing on bacteria. The main doubt on this hypothesis is that seefloor dwellers are not able to move fast;So they lives in a limitted geographic area. Founded fossiles indicate widespread area for Agnostids whereas, if they were seefloor dweller, they would live in a small geographic area.
3) They could live or feed off larger organisms (parasites). This possibility is rejected too. Because if they were parasites, they would have small population. Lots of fossiles related to them have been founded. Technically it is not possible for large populations to be parasites; Because in that case other animals, as hosts, would be extincted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... recognizing their preys; But, there is no any evidence to support the exsitance o...
^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...llers are not able to move fast;So they lives in a limitted geographic area. Founded ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11818181818 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71932174334 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577272727273 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2385529126 49.2860985944 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452243052632 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180091395066 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689011789623 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276882680717 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281026804071 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.