Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, members of each community have influenced and altered the future of the society where they live. With this in mind, some pin points that young have widespread impact on shaping the society, while other look at this concept from a distinctive perspective and believe that elderly people owing to their experience and knowledge have more power and effect on establishing fundamental changes which create the future of their society for youth and next generation. I, personally, subscribe to the former group for quite a few reasons, two of which are as follows.
For one thing, young people are able to participate in prominent social events such as presidential election and choosing the assembly representatives of their cities. In other words, young can assert their view point and requests by voting to the people who are professional and experienced in controlling cities and enacting useful laws. On the other hand, they can dismiss officials who damage natural and financial resources of their countries. As an implication of this issue, younger part of any society have this opportunity to establish indirectly the destiny of their society. It is statistically proven that in all the revolutions which happened in last century all over the world, young people were majority part of revolutionary streams. This clearly indicates that young are active part of the society and their role in determining the society should not underestimate whatsoever.
Another equally momentous point that should be mentioned is that young people can promote the position of their country in the world by achieving appreciable success in different aspects of science, technology, sport, and so on. What I mean is, young are able to introduce their society positively so that international communications with powerful societies will be enhanced. Consistent with this issue, investors are appealed to such countries to invest in various parts of such societies, including economic, technology health and so on, to improve the quality of life there, alongside they discover other talented young in order to break the previous records, provide high-tech devices, and assist people to live healthier.
To sum it up, according to all reasons were discussed above, I, strongly agree that young have cardinal rules on creating the future of their society by making essential decisions through voting as well as achieving great and noticeable success in would scales.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'scale'
Suggestion: scale
...g great and noticeable success in would scales.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, while, i mean, such as, as well as, for one thing, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35475578406 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84679735714 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578406169666 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.7777420272 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.230769231 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9230769231 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186949513143 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690614057807 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441931101247 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121352123284 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205339839516 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 11.7677419355 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.