you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout the history friendship has been always an inevitable and crucial part of
people's lives since it has conspicuous effects on different aspects of life such as feelings, emotions and happiness of people to number just a few. With this in mind, many believe that people having handful friends for a long time are happier than those who have many friends temporarily, while others believe otherwise and emphasis the role of making new friends readily on happiness. I, personally, subscribe to the former group for quite a few reasons which are as follow.
First of all, people who make just a few friends, they consider their tastes and characteristics at first and choose people whose personalities are similar with them and they have a lot in common to talk about and spend their time with. By this I mean, people who choose friends with the same view points and tastes are able to have enjoyable time together. To consistent with this idea, such people continue their relationships for a long period of time since they become satisfied about sharing their time with whom they understand them and have their company in every aspects of life from difficulties and sadness to joys and successes. To illustrate my view point, I would like to provide a quote from Benjamin franklin who states that, “People whose friends have the same attitudes as they have, will definitely diminish the possibility of argument and as a long term consequence they bring about a peaceful life, even if these friends were just a few.” This distinctly indicates the profound impacts of old friends on happiness.
Another equally momentous reason that should be mentioned is that people who have this level of tact to save their limited number of friends for a long time, they cherish the concept of friendship and other relationships. In other words, these people ponder their friends' personalities and circumstances that they are encounter. Consequently, they become helpful and reliable people who have self-satisfaction that lead happiness and joyful in their lives. Since they are responsible towards their friends and whose feelings and the more they become prosperous in their jobs, the happier they are. It is psychologically proved that those who take care of their friends and sake to protect their friendships from misunderstandings and conflicts have stable personalities and the happier, they are as an imperative result.
In conclusion, according to the facts that are discussed above, I firmly hold this opinion that ones who have prolonged restricted friendships are more pleased and happy I their lives since not only do they communicate with people who are similar to them, but also they valuate the importance of their friends’ positions in their life and feel more satisfaction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...always an inevitable and crucial part of peoples lives since it has conspicuous e...
^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...group for quite a few reasons which are as follow. First of all, people who make just ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...and characteristics at first and choose people whose personalities are similar with th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...continue their relationships for a long period of time since they become satisfied about shari...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16447368421 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86132952323 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.9286522632 48.9658058833 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.153846154 100.406767564 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0769230769 20.6045352989 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210869601797 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976518482168 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053084393296 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132332044627 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751932054394 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.1575268817 166% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.