Do you agree or disagree? It is better to work with your own computer and telephone at your home than work in your company's office.
People’s way of accomplishing their work can influence their emotion and productivity, so workers should investigate the apt place of job for them in order to carry out things efficiently. Personally, I believe that working at a home can be beneficial for workers. I have two rationales for holding this opinion, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, working at a home can have positive effect on the nature because we will not produce fumes by constantly commuting to job. It is true that we cannot alter the situation of ambient easily by only not driving private cars. However, if majority of workers begin working at their home, air pollution created by vehicles will diminish significantly. For example, in Mongolia, my home country, pollutant substances in the atmosphere is hot issue of citizens of my hometown. Last year, nearly eighty percent of individuals stopped going to their office due to lockdown related to “COVID-19”. Since that time, Mongolian folks have begun living in the clear environment, so their health was improved thanks to the clean air. For this reason, not only their health, but their children’s well-being will increase.
Secondly, workers will be less exposed to depression if they work at their home. Many individuals get anxious because of their large workloads; thus, they start bemoaning about their situation to their co-workers when they are at their office. Moreover, when people hearken to complain of others, they also get anxious because of this negative environment. However, people can avoid unpleasant ambient when they are at their home. Therefore, they will be happier and more satisfied about their circumstance. Consequently, their attitude toward stuffs will be improved thanks to their positive mood.
Finally, employees can spend their time efficiently if they work at their home because they will not chitchat with working partners. When people work with others, they start talking about unnecessary things in order to befriend with individuals at their job. Unfortunately, they usually do not recognize that they are wasting time of others and them. By contrast, people who work at their house will not confront this type of trouble since there is not any person with whom they speak. As a result, they can devote their time for more essential things such as work, family and chores.
In summation, I am of the opinion that achieving job at a home is advantageous for workers and other things as well. This is because environment crisis will be mitigated, people can carry out their job in the adequate surrounding, and workers will not squander their time by discussing with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, working at a home can hav...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir children’s well-being will increase. Secondly, workers will be less exposed t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...improved thanks to their positive mood. Finally, employees can spend their time ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...things such as work, family and chores. In summation, I am of the opinion that a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, talking about, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.176201373 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77883679378 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510297482838 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2696667793 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.347826087 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122893476457 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531706181359 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533959911738 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856725505991 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393108508089 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.