Do you agree or disagree? Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together.
By and large, it is of very little doubt, if any, that condition of serving meals is an issue of great consideration and importance. The situation of having meals can affect both our quality of life and the level of performance in daily tasks. Consequently, in the modern era, with alteration in some people's habits, who the meals are served with is of key importance more often than not. In this case, some people wonder whether today, having regular family meals together has priority. I am totally in agreement with having family meals still is noteworthy. In the ensuing lines, I will provide two reasons for the collaboration with this thesis.
The first idea worthy of consideration is that having regular family meals is an opportunity for family members to spend time together and accordingly, enjoy one another’s company. Due to the complexity of modern life, most people get stuck in their problems and they usually do not find any chance to spend time with their family members; but, by regular family meals, this company is more likely to happen. Moreover, family mealtime can serve as an escape from the demands and deadlines of daily life and offers an opportunity for speaking to each other and making memories built on fun, laughter, and togetherness. As a case in point, I can remember a time when all members of my family were employed and they did not have enough time for each other, during those days, having family meals was the best chance for us to join together, spend time with each other. Interacting with my parent and siblings especially with face-to-face communication helped me to reduce anxiety. Furthermore, sitting around the dining table talking and laughing, gives me a sense of belonging and can help reinforce the importance of family. This example clearly shows that nowadays having regular family meals has significant importance.
The second reason is that it provides a role model for healthy eating. Nowadays, a huge number of people get interested in fast food or other less-nutritive meals which have several disadvantages for their bodies; on the other, having family meals makes people not serve such meals during the day, even in their busy time. Moreover, people tend to eat less during family meals because they eat more slowly, and talk more which means increased having healthier eating habits. Taking commercially prepared food, for example, they are high in fat, sugar, and salt. As a result, people who eat a lot of tending to have higher obesity rates. However, there is a variety of healthy nutritious sources of food such as fruits, vegetables, fish, and other healthy ingredients available when people used to cook in the kitchen. Hence, when families gather together for having lunch or dinner, not only they can eliminate the unnecessary temptation for harmful ingredients, but also regulate the amount of serving for meals. Therefore, it now seems certain that having regular family meals has significant importance since it offers a healthier life for people.
To sum up, I believe in the modern era, having meals with family members still have priority due to providing a platform for spending time and having fun with family, and creating an opportunity for healthy eating habits. I think people should spend more time with their family more than at mealtime.
- TPO 51 integrated70
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.70
- TPO 41 - integrated writing85
- TOEFL TPO 48 Integrated Writing Task80
- Should parents help their children with their assignments or let them do their assignments independently73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, such as, as a result, by and large, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0253164557 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60890632741 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 879.3 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.157110721 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.826086957 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0434782609 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04347826087 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394203999369 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127518106272 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087768207762 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266574778756 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491421314079 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.