Do you agree or disagree? People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group.
In a world full of advices for having a happier life, there is a long-lasting stuggle for individuals between eliminating toxic people from their lifes or not. Many believe that having a person along side yourself who critisize all of your moves can be profitable. However, others think omitting people who make us feel bad ourselves is essential for our emotional health. I agree with the latter opinion, and I believe that toxic ones should not be a part of our human environment. I will illustrate my reasons in the paragraphs bellow.
First of all, critisizing others can bring lots of tention to a group, especially if this group consists of friends. In other words, we as humans tend to keep our distance from whomever harm our feelings and makes us uncomfortable. This distant can effect on the warmth that should be exist in a friendship. I recal an example that can prove my claim. when I was a highschool students, I was a member of a very intimate group of friends. One of my friends changed into a very critisizing person. At first it was tolorable because this problems that she pointed out made us be aware about our flaws, but as the time passed by, she began to make fun of us. Her behavior eventually broke our friendship with her and brouth lots of unpleasent moments to oure group.
Secondly, group members who always try to find others' weak spots can barely concentrate on their own flaws. In fact, these people usually point out to others weaknesses to hide their owns. This ignorance of critisizing ones can result in them being bad friends and collegues. there are many reaserchs regarding this social missbehavior. In one of the most recent articles of emotonal health magazine, we can observe the diffrence of people who focouse on themselves from others. This article suggests that the first group, are more likely to be successful in their endevours and it is more beneficial to be friend with them.
To sum up, we should decide to keep up with the critisize of people or to eliminate these people from our groups. I, personally prefer to delet these people because not only omitting these kind of people from our life is beneficial for maintaining our emotional healt, but also it is beter for our endevours as an group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
... not. Many believe that having a person along side yourself who critisize all of your move...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'existed'?
Suggestion: existed
...can effect on the warmth that should be exist in a friendship. I recal an example tha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...cal an example that can prove my claim. when I was a highschool students, I was a me...
^^^^
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rson. At first it was tolorable because this problems that she pointed out made us b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...n them being bad friends and collegues. there are many reaserchs regarding this socia...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... these people because not only omitting these kind of people from our life is beneficial f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t also it is beter for our endevours as an group.
^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is beter for our endevours as an group.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, as to, in fact, kind of, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73536895674 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6366382255 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547073791349 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1304000569 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.619047619 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210512545583 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630487816343 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501042512055 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132901557377 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447295164815 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.