Do you agree or disagree with the statement. The best way to travel is in a group led by tour guide.
I personally agree with the method of traveling in a group by a tour guide, the way feel that is because when we go abroad to a whole new country, the environment, language, and culture might be very different from the place where we lived, traveling in a group and led by a professional tour guide who has tons of experiences, can avoid ourselves from being scammed or hurt. In fact, In my previous travel experiences, my tour guides can really deal with most of the issues that travelers might face, such as loss of the wallet or passport. Besides tour guide, there are also several benefits we can get while traveling in a group. For instance, when tourists alone walking down in street in a really late night, they might be robbed and there is literally no one can help, but when a group of people walking together, that chance of being robbed can be reduced dramatically, else, stores and restaurants typically provide more discount to a group of people compare to the traveler who traveling alone, this could also be a reason why I think traveling in a group is better. Though it is no doubt that traveling in a group causes some inconvenience like where you can go or when you can stay in a certain place, except these cons, traveling in a group does provide more benefits to travelers. Last but not least, traveling in a group is always a great decision for me, and I hope in the future I'll have a wonderful trip in a group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1396, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...cision for me, and I hope in the future Ill have a wonderful trip in a group.
^^^
Line 1, column 1400, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...on for me, and I hope in the future Ill have a wonderful trip in a group.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, really, so, while, as to, for instance, i think, in fact, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47709923664 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5912770034 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.6003584229 29% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.1344086022 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.840286643 48.9658058833 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.5 100.406767564 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.6666666667 20.6045352989 212% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.5 5.45110844103 303% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292188857358 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155680292437 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536602877594 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292188857358 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 11.7677419355 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 86.8835125448 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.002688172 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.0537634409 191% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.