Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

When it comes to whether we should let children play computer games or not, My first thought is to disagree, and there are mainly several reasons.
First reason is that there are actually studies and researches that turn out playing computer games can increase children's concentration and it can also help children relieve their phycological pressure, by playing computer games, children can also gain confidence and a sense of accomplishment.
Second, while playing computer games, children can learn things inside the games, such as cooperation, sacrifice, and strategies, these are important skills that could be applied to real life, when children practice these skills in the virtual world, it could bring actual benefit to them no matter from study or work, and will definily help them a lot in the future life.
Though playing computer games will possibly cause some cons like eyes damage or internet addiction, but those will only happen when they and parents fail to control the time of using electronic devices. I believe if parents and children are willing to cooperate together, the benefits children can get will be lots more than disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 52.1666666667 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 1977.66487455 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 187.0 407.700716846 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21390374332 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63239605563 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652406417112 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.6003584229 24% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6253827578 48.9658058833 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.0 100.406767564 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 20.6045352989 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 5.45110844103 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237433398914 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129927593948 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385686031477 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146904099108 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263627823968 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 11.7677419355 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.