Do you agree or disagree? Why? Teachers were more appreciated in the past rather than what they are today.
The world, in which we live, has ceaselessly undergone tremendous transitions, and teachers’ social status is not an exception. In this line of thought, so many people take the view that in modern communities tutors own a better social status and are more appreciated that what they were in the past decades. Others, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with latter notion because of two reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first and foremost reason which comes to mind substantiating my idea is that teachers were the only source of information if the past. To be more specific, in the past because of the high rate of illiteracy and few number of the educated individuals in the societies, instructors were very respected in people’s eyes. However, in today’s modern rea thanks to the technology interested individuals can obtain knowledge from a wide various sources such as internet, online classes, and huge number of available books. Therefore, teachers were very appreciated in the past than what they are today.
The second reason which deserve some words here is that in the past instructors had to make tremendous efforts to gain knowledge and become a teacher. In fact, the tutor’s appreciation in the previous generation was partly because of their efforts for learning. Sometimes they had to travel long distances to acquire information from a knowledgeable person. On the other hand, today’s tutors can easily can easily enroll in different classes and even learn thing by their own thanks to the immense number of information resources.
Lastly, some people might say that today’s teachers are more appreciated because they earn more money. At first glance, this claim may sound completely true, but to answer this statement it should be considered precisely. In fact, the reason which bring about more salary for today’s tutors is the family desire for having a highly educated kids. Today’s parents are concerned about children scores and their future jobs therefore they spend more money for education without any regard to whom they are paying they just look for good results.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that previous generations were more concerned about respect to the teachers, For, tutors did study hard and pay plenty of time and effort to be a teacher and because instructors were they only reliable treasury of information people in past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ause of the high rate of illiteracy and few number of the educated individuals in the soci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...an obtain knowledge from a wide various sources such as internet, online classes, and h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'can easily'.
Suggestion: can easily
...rson. On the other hand, today’s tutors can easily can easily enroll in different classes and even le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...reliable treasury of information people in past.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, so, therefore, in fact, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15012106538 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78505731941 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549636803874 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6748398003 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2941176471 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285617476721 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101064618459 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119926298375 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162420665134 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603934161901 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.