Do you agree or disagree?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular (liked by students) and effective in helping students in learning.
People attitudes toward teachers' performance and their approaches and effective methods of education are varied from person to person. Some are inclined toward the opinion that it is simple for teachers to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning, on the other extreme of the rope, others hold exactly the opposite perspective and believe that it is challenging for teachers to be strict and attractive for students in education areas and helping them simultaneously. While both sides take their own positions, from my vantage point, the first group carries more weight. To be more specific, I will explain my reasons and notions in the following paragraph.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with the issue that, the more careful to students, the better grades they can receive, and the more popularity teachers can have. In other words, the relationship between students and teachers plays a large role in the trajectory of a students’ academic success and social development. Establishing a positive relationship with their teacher helps students feel more comfortable and safe in their classroom environments. Actually, not only is there no contradiction between being popular and effective in helping students in learning, but also, these two essential factors will overlap and empower each other. For example, some sociologists did empirical researches about various education approaches all around the world and finally found out that the best and most popular teachers try to develop and improve their education methods by considering some factors that are very important for students such as effective teaching and making a humorous and lovely atmosphere in class. Therefore, if teachers don't well informed of their students’ lifestyles, habits and attitudes, they will be obscure when they communicate with students.
Second, if teachers are instructive, compassionate, and humorous, students will be more successful in the near future. In fact, if students will be under too much pressure and stress, a humorous, kind, and receptive teacher can reduce their stress and anxiety and attract their attention and stimulate their interests in classes. For instance, the impressive results and overwhelming evidence of descriptive and inferential statistical analysis in a university indicate that high school teachers who are careful and strict about students’ behavior and approach and also try to teach them various material properly and efficiently are more attractive and popular for students than other teachers. Consequently, students study and behave well in the class taught by the teacher they loved.
On the other hand, some people believe that high school teachers have to be strict about their students because students are not mature enough to concentrate on their life and duties. If teachers are not strict and careful about students' life particularly their education, students will not pay attention to their duties and homework effectively; therefore, many teachers will lose their reputation and families will accuse teachers because of students poor performance.
To sum up, based on the all argumentations stated above, the student/teacher relationship is a cornerstone in a student’s social maturation process. The high levels of teacher engagement have a positive effect on students’ engagement levels and performance and eventually more popularity teachers can have. Moreover, characteristic of teachers is a very important and crucial factor for students. As a result, popular teachers know that it is not difficult to be strict, meticulous, and compassionate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...paragraph. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with the iss...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1085, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sphere in class. Therefore, if teachers dont well informed of their students' l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 42.0 13.8261648746 304% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3125.0 1977.66487455 158% => OK
No of words: 559.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59033989267 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86242540663 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07299849558 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479427549195 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 967.5 618.680645161 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.9233562541 48.9658058833 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.25 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.95 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.15 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393749233167 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142917634115 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795003765592 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26539590526 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415322696844 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.