Generally speaking, I hold the contradictory view to the statement that individuals do very few things well because they are busy doing so many various things.
First, doing diverse kinds of things can develop positive attitudes much easier than just doing one thing all along. I can recall when I prepared for my college entrance examination, all I had to do was just to study hard and try to get a higher point. I felt a little bit depressed at that time, since the review for the examination was tedious and onerous. For a period, the harder I tried, the lower points I got. Once I blew a test again, I found myself with tears coming on and with them came desperation and hopelessness. I was absolutely broken emotionally without exaggeration. My father forced me to stop studying that night and pick up brushes and color palette again to doodle. By doodling, I slowed my pace, took a breath and relaxed myself. From then on, I always found some time to doodle which cultivated a positive attitude. Undoubtedly, this kind of stable and optimistic feelings can influence my academic achievements in a considerable ways. Therefore, the result caused by dwelling too much on one task may be no better than doing assorted things in a meantime.
Second, doing assorted things at the same time may gain more efficiency, as different missions can have mutual promotion to each other. One of the most eminent Renaissance polymath, Leonardo Da Vinci, whose area of interest included sculpting, painting, architecture and so on, was regarded as one of the mostly diversely talented individuals ever to have lived. To be more specific, his anatomy knowledge was a great help to get the proportion of human body accurately, thus representing the character more realistically in sculpture.
Third, although individual's attention may objectively be scattered when dealing with several stuff, doing different things at the same time actually can help people improve their efficiency, because they are used to make their timetable flexible and practical. A survey conducted by experts from Oxford University shows that over 90% of the enterprisers can make good schedule and handle different things effectively and efficiently. These kinds of ability are cultivated by their dealing with their routing jobs always involving all kinds of various things.
By considering the several benefits stated above, individuals who are busy doing many a different thing, can finish their work as well as those who focus on one single stuff. In some degree, they can do even better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...and try to get a higher point. I felt a little bit depressed at that time, since the revie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 955, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...academic achievements in a considerable ways. Therefore, the result caused by dwelli...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... doing assorted things in a meantime. Second, doing assorted things at the sam...
^^^
Line 6, column 86, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun stuff seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some stuff'.
Suggestion: some stuff
...ectively be scattered when dealing with several stuff, doing different things at the same tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to making'.
Suggestion: used to making
...rove their efficiency, because they are used to make their timetable flexible and practical....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...involving all kinds of various things. By considering the several benefits stat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08293838863 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83760920674 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590047393365 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.570390323 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313080432213 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875926773813 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138009322115 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232776855193 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187282664037 0.0645574589148 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.