Even though an effective leader is usually considered to make decisions by himself, from my perspective, he should make others feel they are actually involved in the process of making decisions.
First, more advice will be put foward during the decision-making process, and the leader can attain the best idea after comparing all these suggestion thus resulting in succeess. The imagination and knowledge of one individual is limited. I used to be a leader in a theatre club when I was a middle school student. Our club was supposed to have a show at the end of the year to celebrate the New Year as routine activities. The day before the show was played, I was told that the curtain of the stage, which is made special for the show, is shorter than the stage's height. If it was hung up as usual, the audience would see the legs of the actors during the time they switched the scenery, which would disipate their attention and looked funny. But this play is supposed to have a severe ending. I was exhausted to deal with this problem and there was only little time left before the show began. The vice leader gathered all the members to handle this problem. Someone said we should use the old curtain, but others said we should try to use other materials to remake the curtain and make the curtain longer using tissues. In the end, we got a best idea. Two characters kept acting a dialogue during scenery switching time. I would never come up this idea if I just kept consdering by myself.
Second, teamwork is essential for the efficiency and let members to make decisions together can develop a fantasitic cohesion whithin the team. Before there is a call-in show in my university's radio station, we just followed the regulation made by school leaders. Using the call-in show, on the other hand, we can talk about the current issues of our university we usually care, and take part in making decisions or regulation by ourselves. Last month, we passes a regulation to avoid leaving food in the plates, which was suggested by all the students. All the students are willing to follow and this indeed help the school leaders.
To sum up, being a leader is to ventilate the arguments among the team members. Only in this way can a team find the best decision and do their best to implement them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this suggestion' or 'these suggestions'?
Suggestion: this suggestion; these suggestions
...ttain the best idea after comparing all these suggestion thus resulting in succeess. The imagina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stages'' or 'stage's'?
Suggestion: stages'; stage's
...ecial for the show, is shorter than the stages height. If it was hung up as usual, the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...onger using tissues. In the end, we got a best idea. Two characters kept acting a...
^
Line 3, column 1296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea if I just kept consdering by myself. Second, teamwork is essential for the ef...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'pass'
Suggestion: pass
...regulation by ourselves. Last month, we passes a regulation to avoid leaving food in t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, look, second, so, thus, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64460784314 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48948070433 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1905002162 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2380952381 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270650474093 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625495540764 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119129854723 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208739554211 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191128875394 0.0645574589148 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.