With the rapid development of our society, modern people have much more free choice than before, while they come across a problem whether efforts will largely fail in the case of doing things concurrently?
Even though doing many things at the same time may dissipate one's strength in many directions, I think multi-tasking does not result in failure necessarily but help improve one's odds to succeed to some degree.
First, doing diverse kinds of things can develop positive attitudes much easier than just doing one thing all along. I can recall when I prepared for my college entrance examination, all I had to do was just to study hard and try to get a higher point. I felt a little bit depressed at that time, since the review for the examination was tedious and onerous. For a period, the harder I tried, the lower points I got. Once I blew a test again, I found myself with tears coming on and with them came desperation and hopelessness. I was absolutely broken emotionally without exaggeration. My father forced me to stop studying that night and pick up brushes and color palette again to doodle. By doodling, I slowed my pace, took a breath and relaxed myself. From then on, I always found some time to doodle which cultivated a positive attitude. Undoubtedly, this kind of stable and optimistic feelings can influence my academic achievements in a considerable way. Therefore, the result caused by dwelling too much on one task may be no better than doing assorted things in a meantime.
Second, doing assorted things at the same time may gain more efficiencies, as different missions can have interaction in positive ways. One of the most eminent Renaissance polymath, Leonardo Da Vinci, whose area of interest included sculpting, painting, architecture and so on, was regarded as one of the mostly diversely talented individuals ever to have lived.To be more specific, his anatomy knowledge was a great help to get the proportion of human body accurately, thus representing the character more realistically in sculpture.
Third, although individual's attention may objectively be diluted by multi-tasking, it can force people to cultivate one's time management and organization skills. A survey conducted by experts from Oxford University shows that over 90% of the elites and enterprisers possess good temporal programing capability. They can use the skills to deal with multiple tasks concurrently, thus increasing efficiency. These kinds of ability are cultivated by their dealing with their routing jobs always involving all kinds of various things.
By considering the several benefits stated above, individuals with the ability to handle multi-tasking may be more adaptable to the fierce competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y things at the same time may dissipate ones strength in many directions, I think mu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...in failure necessarily but help improve ones odds to succeed to some degree. Fir...
^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...and try to get a higher point. I felt a little bit depressed at that time, since the revie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 938, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a considerable way" with adverb for "considerable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... can influence my academic achievements in a considerable way. Therefore, the result caused by dwelli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... doing assorted things in a meantime. Second, doing assorted things at the sam...
^^^
Line 6, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...talented individuals ever to have lived.To be more specific, his anatomy knowledge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, well, while, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19501133787 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96675255522 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6733100939 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.55 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173930169334 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469060616838 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666558967742 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087409571974 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551890382167 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.