Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in?
In the contemporary world, there are a huge number of tasks and activities in which people daily and nightly are participating. Beyond any doubt, skills and talents are the key factors to fulfill these actions. And usually, people are willing to participate in an activity that they are good at and can afford it. The controversial question which arises here is whether people should choose the task and activity based on their skills and interest or talent itself can play the only essential factor in choosing it. As far as I am concerned, skill and interest play cardinal roles in doing an activity in the best way. Although some might find this controversial, in what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
First of all, it is significant to be mentioned that skills and interests provide people with vast opportunities to get involved in many tasks they want to and talent deficiency itself can not hinder the progress. It is indisputable that talent is an inherent quality that people mostly inherit from their biological parents and talented people without good education cannot cope with the task. According to a survey conducted in my country Iran, back to 2016, two groups of students have given a certain task to be done. The first group was the selected talented students and the second one was the educated and learned students who had been familiar with the subject. The result has clearly demonstrated that the last group who was good at that activity could have done the outstanding part of the task in less time compared to the first group.
Moreover, it is axiomatic that had people been learned and skilled at an activity, they would have been found more self-esteem. Based on a recent book that I have read, the author implied that self-confidence and self-esteem in doing an activity brought about a person with more sense of self-actualization and consequently caused him/her would put all effort to cope even in burdensome tasks. Being good and skilled at the assigned work not only do people help to carry out it in less time, but also they can perform it in better quality.
To wrap it up, contrary beliefs might be tossed around about whether talented people can get more success in activities. Conversely, based on the aforementioned reasons, I hold the idea that people should take part in activities that they are good at rather than talented in. As a matter of fact, there are some other reasons and examples that can be invoked to support my perspective, but let’s suffice to this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...up. Moreover, it is axiomatic that had people been learned and skilled at an activity...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, moreover, second, so, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85846867749 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72420817452 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526682134571 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0207565627 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.176470588 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321604512176 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108883068802 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963679325574 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202159672826 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411670207659 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.