Is it wise to say that we can do everything by ourselves , mostly study? There are two schools of thoughts one thought answers aforementioned question in the affirmative where as other thought disagrees cogently. According to my point of view preparing for test with classmate is always better because of two reasons, time saver and another one is better understanding of each other
First school of thought explains that for big test lots of preparations are required while working on this with classmate will ease the load. long before someone stated that If you want to achieve progress then walk alone and if you want to go long in life walk with people. It has lots of benefits as time saver. To complete one task one person needs one hour and together both can take less time. Few days ago I started preparing for TOEFL and then i realized that I need partner to study speaking section. My classmate proved himself good study partner by helping me.
Secondly, I and my classmate has some similarities so the speed of task completion is faster. Common qualities like we both are from same study background and probably we both might have to face same big test. With this same qualities some differences forced us to study together that was we both had mastery in different subject. We shared our knowledge and then study rate increased by twice more than alone studies. If your classmate with experience of same big test will be a bonus point to speed up process. Researchers proved that group studies are better than alone study they proved this by comparing test results of both.
However, the other school of thought differs in its line of reasoning. Its logic is also cogent enough to take into consideration. They assert that. choosing right classmate for test preparation is important because due to wrong selection time will be wasted and at the time of test we will not be prepared very well.
Hence after a holistic analysis, it is evident that the points in favor of the first school overpower the points in favor of the second with its logic, cogency and rationale
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y that we can do everything by ourselves , mostly study? There are two schools of ...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...rementioned question in the affirmative where as other thought disagrees cogently. Accor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne is better understanding of each other First school of thought explains that fo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Long
...this with classmate will ease the load. long before someone stated that If you want ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... I started preparing for TOEFL and then i realized that I need partner to study s...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elf good study partner by helping me. Secondly, I and my classmate has some si...
^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eased by twice more than alone studies. If your classmate with experience of same ...
^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Choosing
...e into consideration. They assert that. choosing right classmate for test preparation is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...nsideration. They assert that. choosing right classmate for test preparation is impor...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... we will not be prepared very well. Hence after a holistic analysis, it is eviden...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith its logic, cogency and rationale
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79063360882 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51689587053 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550964187328 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0070127566 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5263157895 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314195437332 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07373667557 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854266636215 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153541630502 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732446761501 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.