During our careers, we work with many different kinds of people. All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits. In your opinion, which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker?
a serious attitude regarding their work obligations
a willingness to learn new things
the ability to make other people laugh
People have different thoughts and opinions about the best type of personality at the workplace. While some people believe it is essential to have a serious attitude at the workplace. I beg to differ, I think having the ability to make other people laugh is the best trait.
Many people out there propose that being serious is crucial when it comes to work. They believe that it makes people more aware and responsible toward their job. In my opinion, I believe that the seriousness might scare people. In fact, It pushes people to execute their job wrongly, the pressure would make the person anxious and eventually lead to more mistakes. Last year, I remembered working with a big company in New York City, and the boss was a serious, arrogant, and obnoxious person. All of the staff used to fear him. And that added a lot of mistakes in the project. On the other hand, Now I work with a funny boss, he makes us laugh by telling funny jokes, he is such a humble person. Consequently, we all love him, and most of the staff perform their job correctly in a significant amount of time.
Moreover, the ability to make people laugh has a tremendous effect in creating a positive environment at the workplace. All the staff can get along together and enjoy working and achieving goals together.
Yet, other old school types of people may think that by laughing and being serious, the person can lose other people’s respect, so they prefer to apply the old fashion manners of the powerful boss towards his employees. In my opinion, this is a hundred percent wrong notion. Respect does not have to be formal. And my previous experience is a compelling example of this. If my boss had not been a funny and laidback person, I would not have been able to respect and love him.
In conclusion, the trait of being able to make other people laugh at work is critical to the work environment. I firmly believe that everyone at work should be friendly and funny in order to achieve a healthy relationship between colleges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t type of personality at the workplace. While some people believe it is essential to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...erious, arrogant, and obnoxious person. All of the staff used to fear him. And that added ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, so, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68067226891 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52478086867 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1564682071 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5714285714 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253518135526 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765668430082 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477962064126 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139539154828 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582688276596 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.