During our careers, we work with many differnet kinds of people. All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits. In your opinion, which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker?
1. a serious attitude regarding their work obligations
2. a willingness to learn new things
3. the ability to make other people laugh
There is an opinion that the most significant characteristic of a coworker is a willingness to learn new things. Personally, i agree with that statement.
Firstly, a coworker who is ready to learn new things will be able to make our work more time- effective and reliable. For instance, today in dentistry a lot of new technologies and materials are developing. My friend and coworker is always interested in new things. One year ago he learned in Germany the inovational way, which made possible to repair tooth crown only for one visit. Previously, we did it for two visits, but his knowledge provided us to do it only for one. In addition, crowns which is created by new approach are more stress-resistant. Hence, my coworker brought to our dental clinic the method, which are very useful in everyday practice.
Secondly, a coworker’s wish to explore new things has a positive effect on employees’s motivation. In big companies employees have a top chart of most effective workers. The best ones have more opportunities in job promotion than others. There is no doubt that new knowledge makes worker be more effective and gives a higher position in the top chart. This situation creates a competetive atmosphere between colleagues and everybody tries to work harder. Also, a companie benefit from it by having more qualificated empoyees.
In conclusion, i would say that a coworker’s willingness to learn new things is the best trait, which increase the effectivness of work and motivates other colleagues to work more thoroughly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ngness to learn new things. Personally, i agree with that statement. Firstly, ...
^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ualificated empoyees. In conclusion, i would say that a coworker’s willingness...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 254.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08661417323 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11482020415 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6386473234 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141193383076 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480143467159 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412970836081 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104559203696 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407210132882 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.