Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
1. interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2. wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3. say nothing
Today people have a lot of meetings and presentations. Sometime the speaker makes mistakes during a speech and different people prefer different approaches in order to solve that problem. Personally, I believe that the best way is to interrupt the speaker and correct the mistake immediately.
Firstly, when I correct the teacher in a classroom, it will help others to understand material better and not to make mistakes in the following exams. There is no doubt that teaching students is a hard job and sometimes the teacher can make mistakes because of exhaustion. As a result, students could be misled and they could misunderstand the material properly. For instance, when I was a student our class had a lot of lectures. After each week of lectures the professor tested us in order to control the studing process. One day during his lecture about bichemichal reactions in duodenum he unintentionally made a mistake, as a result, the next reactions were wrong because the first one was incrorrect. I knew that, but I decided to remain the silent and not to interrupt the lecturer. As a result, all our class got bad grades because students learnt the wrong material from the lecture. Hence, if I had corrected the professor, my classmates would have inderstood material properly and avoided the bad marks.
Secondly, the correction mistakes during a meeting is a good source for the future development and discussuion. It is not a secret that the presentations and meetings are aimed to improve people’s knowledge. For example, i’m a dentist and every week we with my colleagues in clinic discuss hard cases. Every member of our team prepares case and presents it to us. After meeting we obtain new experience and treatment protocols. The best way to analyze our mistakes during the presentation is to be corrected by members, who are listening. Therefore, correction in the meetings is a good way to improve skills in medical thinking.
In conclusion, I would say that the immediate correction the speaker during the speech is a good way to help classamets to understand material properly and colleagues to know how to do a good treatrment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tudent our class had a lot of lectures. After each week of lectures the professor tes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I’m'?
Suggestion: I’m
...mprove people’s knowledge. For example, i’m a dentist and every week we with my col...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00835654596 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96207303707 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509749303621 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3658935394 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13694672513 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421320706601 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039549154582 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816733945276 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235087612087 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.