The reading and the lecture both are about the prediction of an earthquake that happens on the Earth. The author of the reading states that there a various method which is suggested for the prediction of an earthquake not for the reduction of damages. However, the lecture suggests that the pieces of evidence that are provided in the article are not valid and convincing. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, Among the various method of prediction of earthquake, one of them is by observing animal behaviour. He also focuses that animals are more sensitive than human beings in this case. Meanwhile, the lecturer refutes this point. He says that animal shows this kind of behaviour because of minor shaking of the Earth. Furthermore, he mentions that minor trembling doesn't lead to the Earthquake.
Secondly, the reading asserts that headaches problem in the human being is another symptom of occurring the Earthquake. The presence of magnetite in the human brain is the key factor that people come to know the earthquake is happening. Although, the speaker disputes this argument. He argues that magnetite in the human brain is found to be in a small amount. The amount of magnetite is sufficient to predict the Earthquake. Moreover, he points out that the human cannot encounter the Earthquake.
Finally, the writer of the article claims that radon is emitted during the Earthquake. Most of the rocks release a small amount of radon whenever a seismic change occurs. On the other hand, the speaker believes that radon is not only the thing that releases from the rock. Besides, he feels that radon can be obtained from landslide also and we should not neglect this evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rmore, he mentions that minor trembling doesnt lead to the Earthquake. Secondly, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'headaches'' or 'headache's'?
Suggestion: headaches'; headache's
...ke. Secondly, the reading asserts that headaches problem in the human being is another s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me to know the earthquake is happening. Although, the speaker disputes this argument. He...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96644295302 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58878644031 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7201088045 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0197234909154 0.236089414692 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.005578533229 0.076458572812 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236677120518 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0124019502174 0.150856017488 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214808078894 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.