The reading and the lecture both are about the prediction of earthquake that happens on the Earth. The author of the reading states that there various method which are suggested for the prediction of earthquake not for the reduction of damages. However, the lecture suggests that the evidences that are provided in the article are not valid and convincing. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, Among the various method of prediction of earthquake, one of them is by observing the animal behaviour. He also focuses that animal are more sensitive than the human beings in this case. Meanwhile, the lecturer refutes this point. He says that animal shows this kinds of behaviour because of minor shaking of the Earth. Furthermore, he mentions that minor trembling doesn't lead to the Earthquake.
Secondly, the reading asserts that headaches problem in the human being is another symptom of occuring the Earthquake. The presence of magnetite in the human brain is the key factor that people come to know the earthquake is happening. Although, the speaker disputes this argument. He argues that magnetite in the human brain is found to be in smalll amount. The amount of magnetite is sufficient to predict the Earthquake. Moreover, he points out that the human cannot encounter the Earthquake.
Finally, the writer of the article claims that radon is emitted during the Earthquake. Most of the rocks releases small amount of radon whenever a seismic change occur. On the other hand, the speaker believes that radon is not only the things that releases from the rock. Besides, he feels that radon can be obtain from lanslide also and we should not neglet this evidence.
The reading and the lecture both are about the prediction of an earthquake that happens on the Earth. The author of the reading states that there a various method which is suggested for the prediction of an earthquake not for the reduction of damages. However, the lecture suggests that the pieces of evidence that are provided in the article are not valid and convincing. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, Among the various method of prediction of earthquake, one of them is by observing animal behaviour. He also focuses that animals are more sensitive than human beings in this case. Meanwhile, the lecturer refutes this point. He says that animal shows this kind of behaviour because of minor shaking of the Earth. Furthermore, he mentions that minor trembling doesn't lead to the Earthquake.
Secondly, the reading asserts that headaches problem in the human being is another symptom of occurring the Earthquake. The presence of magnetite in the human brain is the key factor that people come to know the earthquake is happening. Although, the speaker disputes this argument. He argues that magnetite in the human brain is found to be in a small amount. The amount of magnetite is sufficient to predict the Earthquake. Moreover, he points out that the human cannot encounter the Earthquake.
Finally, the writer of the article claims that radon is emitted during the Earthquake. Most of the rocks release a small amount of radon whenever a seismic change occurs. On the other hand, the speaker believes that radon is not only the thing that releases from the rock. Besides, he feels that radon can be obtained from landslide also and we should not neglect this evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rmore, he mentions that minor trembling doesnt lead to the Earthquake. Secondly, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'headaches'' or 'headache's'?
Suggestion: headaches'; headache's
...ke. Secondly, the reading asserts that headaches problem in the human being is another s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me to know the earthquake is happening. Although, the speaker disputes this argument. He...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96644295302 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58878644031 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7201088045 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8947368421 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.