Essay topics: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of humanity, success in life has played a significant role in people's. At the turn of the new century, with the development of humans modern society, more and more people tend to explore new things, Actually, people's attitudes toward this issue are varied from person to person. Although many would argue that the easier to identify the career in the past. In my opinion, Nowadays, with modern technology It became easy to choose your career. I would suggest two reasons based on my general facts in addition to my personal experiences to support the argument.
The first aspect to point out is that no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in today's sophisticated world we live in, the technology played a role important to discover a several of fields, to name but a few. HR human resources; Furthermore, many benefits quickly stem from the technology. Also, the efficiency of a society is measured by the degree and the quality of its using a technology to identify a career. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what has elaborated above. many young people when to graduate from their university they don't know how can they do in their career. So they go to the technology to research the suitable work of them through their skills.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that the technology provides single greatest determinant of the person's success in our days. Indeed, young people today depend on technology in order to increase their thoughts and ideas. Eventually, that has great impacts on their personalities by teaching them how to manage their time and resources to reach their goals. For instance, following the technology stimulate their creativity and enhance their performance in their jobs. In contrast, in the past people had limited ways to improve themselves and a few types of jobs. Thus, by dedicating technology to increase our knowledge we can ensure our bright future.
To draw a conclusion, taking what I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that technology changed our life to identify our career. Admittedly, technology is a great teacher to build character and choose a daily job which is suitable for our skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...issue are varied from person to person. Although many would argue that the easier to ide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...hed light on what has elaborated above. many young people when to graduate from thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... to graduate from their university they dont know how can they do in their career. S...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ides single greatest determinant of the persons success in our days. Indeed, young peop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90616621984 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71060028307 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554959785523 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.55220261 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3157894737 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133878118514 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452490631603 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495217988156 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795623837117 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395084604048 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.