Essay topics: TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Nowadays, with the fierce competition, the issue that whether to work quickly and risk making mistakes are more important than to work slowly and make sure correctness has arouse people's concern. Some citizens think that working quickly is the priority. However, from my perspective, it is a compelling argument to argue that working slowly and ensuring the correctness are more vital based on the following considerations.
My first emphatic approval should be given to the reason that working in a slow path and ensuring correctness enables people to acquire more knowledge and ability. It bears watching that ensuring correctness requires much efforts, such as searching for some extra information and learning by doing. The prime example is my cousin, Mike, a student majored in computer science. Last summer, he worked as data scientist assistant in Google, and the assignments are all about customer analysis. At first, insufficient as his proficiency is, Mike had to read a lot of guiding tutorials and revised his projects for many times to make sure every details are considered, which cost Mike a huge amount of time. It is the process of correcting his mistakes that Mike obtained a plethora of skills and made great progress. However, if Mike focused on speed rather than correctness, he would not gain so much knowledge and make so huge development. Therefore, I am led to the idea that working slowly and making sure everything is right is more essential than working quickly and leaving some mistakes.
What should be paid attention is that working slowly and making sure no mistakes will place people as beneficiaries via leaving others good impression of carefulness. It is crystal clear that people who seldom make mistakes are more reliable, and no one would be reluctant to work with such reliable people. According to the survey conducted by Peking University, it shows that 94 percent of employees indicate that they like to work with scrupulous colleagues, and 76 percent of supervisors show that workers with circumspection are preferred because they have more prosperity. In contrast, the workers who often make mistakes are not regarded as promising, though they can work quickly. Thus, I am convinced that the correctness is more important than quickness.
It is true that the making everything is right is time-consuming because every details need to be checked. Nevertheless, the mistakes will finally be spotted and rectified by other testers, which means the whole time spent on the project is longer. Consequently, I am immune to the assertion that ensuring the correctness will result in a waste of time.
In conclusion, based on the fine-grained analysis, I am confident to claim that working slowly and ensuring the correctness are more significant than working quickly and risking mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'aroused'.
Suggestion: aroused
...rk slowly and make sure correctness has arouse peoples concern. Some citizens think th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...hing that ensuring correctness requires much efforts, such as searching for some ext...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30549450549 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97533230795 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0798113016 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.7 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369412015507 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11890317477 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104802510109 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231537700684 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11117883173 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.