Everyone experiences being a leader at some point in their life. However, not everyone is good at leading others. What do you think are the qualities of a good leader?
There are some people who are born as leaders and to lead others. These people have an inherent sense of leadership inside their minds and are able to obtain the trust of others. When the qualities and characteristics of such people are studied carefully, there are some factors that can be found commonly in successful leaders. In my opinion, the two qualities that are present in every good leader are humility and passion.
To begin with, a good leader is always humble. In this case, by humility, I mean when a person is aware of their bad qualities and is able to improve from them, rather than being oblivious to their weaknesses and being proud and arrogant. An arrogant individual would never be able to lead the people because the emotion of arrogance would not let him care about other people. On the other hand, the quality of humility allows the individual to be aware of their surroundings and to consider others before themselves. I personally had an experience with a leader who was arrogant. During a group project in high school, I was teamed up with a senior and three of my classmates. The senior was very arrogant and gave us a hard time by ignoring our opinions and preferences and doing the project as his heart pleased. Ultimately this lowered our motivations, and we were not able to work to the best of our abilities. Due to this, our group was not able to get a high grade on the project. This experience led me to believe that arrogance is a factor that can severely damage the group, especially when it is the leader who is arrogant. If the senior was humble and had listened to our opinions more, I am sure that the outcome would have been way better.
Another quality that I think must be present in a good leader is passion. If the leader is not passionate about his goals, then it is not strange that the other members would not be passionate as well. It is the duty of the leader to motivate those who are being led, and if the leader lacks passion, this is not possible. I recently had a great experience with a leader who was passionate. While being in a volunteer club, I was able to learn a lot about being a leader from the club’s leader. He would explain his personal experiences while volunteering while emphasizing the things that he learned from those experiences. When he was talking, everyone in the room could feel his passion for volunteering, and this motivated us to volunteer more and become like him. Even when I was being lazy and had to force myself to volunteer, the moment I saw him working hard next to me, I was able to become passionate about volunteering again.
Therefore, due to my life experiences, I believe that the two most important characteristics of being a leader are humility and passion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-03 | Panda@Love | 60 | view |
2021-06-01 | KEVA | 76 | view |
2021-04-23 | SaC | 78 | view |
2020-09-24 | Jenil_Jain | 73 | view |
2020-09-24 | Jenil_Jain | 70 | view |
- Many of the world s lesser known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct 71
- It is better to go on a trip by oneself than to take a group tour with a guide 70
- Everyone experiences being a leader at some point in their life However not everyone is good at leading others What do you think are the qualities of a good leader 73
- We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo company Since the adver 75
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, well, while, i mean, i think, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 44.0 15.1003584229 291% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61740890688 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64508601515 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449392712551 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9540360507 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0416666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257188728425 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867097342087 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703525808429 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161221246397 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345652081805 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.