the evidence of the organic material in the fossil of the T-rex
The reading asserts that there is some evidence of remaining tissues of the dinosaur T-rex indicating that it having blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix; however, the professor finds this idea skeptical and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the author of the reading.
First, the reading argues that the evidence displayed the presence of a soft, flexible organic substance which represents the remains of actual blood vessels of T-rex. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that finding soft substances does not prove anything, as they can stem from other things such as bacteria. She adds that bacteria can make hollows and as they leave, there will be organic material left and in this case, it is of the likelihood that these remains were the remains of the bacterial colonies.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that microscopic examination found that there were spheres, which can be the remains of blood cells in the inner bone of the T-rex. In contrast, the speaker underlies the fact that there is evidence, in which the presence of this finding was acknowledged. Researchers even saw this in primitive animals who did not have red blood cells, therefore the findings are not really spheres and probably have another origin and maybe they were just reddish minerals.
Finally, the author of the text asserts that tests proved the presence of collagen on the dinosaur's leg bone. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that it counteracts scientists findings about collagen, as the oldest animal's that has to be shown of having collagen, age is eleven thousand years old, hence it is not plausible to find collagen from a seventy years old dinosaur. Additionally, he asserts that it is possible that the finding came from researchers' hands who were handling the bones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nimals who did not have red blood cells, therefore the findings are not really sp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, really, so, therefore, as to, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04262295082 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5465808263 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0226149886 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.8 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.6045352989 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9 5.45110844103 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 11.8709677419 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112148543911 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460150393996 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662790669188 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730945404518 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655620447258 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.