Possible solutions to save frogs from extinction.
The reading asserts that since the population of frogs is diminishing as time goes by, we should take some actions in order to save them from extinction and proposes three potential solutions in order to do so. The lecturer, however, finds the solutions problematic and casts doubt on the solutions proposed by the author of the reading.
The author argues that we should change the law in a way that it would prohibit farmers from using pesticides, for when pesticides enter frog's body, they harm frog by attacking frog's nervous system. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it cannot be such a practical solution. Forcing farmers not to use pesticides is neither economical nor fair, as they are competing in their business and it can eventually end up in losing crops and lower yields.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that they should try to eliminate a kind of fungus and cure the infected frogs by the medications, which has been recently discovered by the researchers. On contrary, the lecturer underlies the fact that using treatment on a large scale is extremely hard to carry out, because they would need to administer the medication to the frogs, one by one. additionally, they would need to execute the same action on their next generations as well, which can be considered a hard and expensive action to do.
Finally, the reading asserts that in order to save frog's habitat, we should protect lakes and marshes from excessive water use. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that saving frog's population cannot be accomplished by saving wetlands, but by countering global warming. Moreover, she expresses that entire species go extinct, because of global warming and we cannot just use less water instead of facing global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...posed by the author of the reading. The author argues that we should change the...
^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...he medication to the frogs, one by one. additionally, they would need to execute the same a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9164114174 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 21.2450331126 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4811979758 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.0 110.228320801 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 21.698381199 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21947501556 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923643519995 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891415639928 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135165250393 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778596509022 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.3589403974 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 11.0289183223 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.498013245 160% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.