The expression ”Never, never give up” means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals, Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Use specific reasons and examples to support your idea.
The world is full of amazing things and destructions. It is easy for some people to overcome but it also can be obstacles for some persons. From my point of view, I believe that people ought to try to achieve their goal. For this reason, I will explain in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the self believe is an essential role that take place in the success of a person live. The one who don’t possess persistence and diligent cannot certainly approach what is the motivation and how can they reach the right way for their dreams. In addition, the progress of trying hard always must be with the procedure and not ot hesitate whether there are a lot of barriers. For instance, Thomas Edison, one of the most famous scientists, who was invented the electricity that he had to overcome a variety of failure but, at last, he achieved the reputation with the honor of his hard-working invention.
Secondly, the quitting is bad manner which can establish to cause habit whenever they face with the difficulties in their life. It the one time start with the surrender in their first step, it is apparently to outcome the result of progressive give up. On the other hand, the commitment is the power of the mindset, and should make and effort onto it. I have one example who can fulfil her dream with her accurate goals without stop trying. She is my aunt who has two adorable twin. Owing to her children, she had comparisons between them and her job opportunity. However, she decided to manage time and chose to fully responsible for both of them. As a result, she possess the fantastic family without financial problem with her favourite job. Hence, the key factor of the success is not to loose the momentum and resilience.
To sum up, the important issue is to solve the drawback and not to surrender. Therefore, the main belief for me is not to stop trying and not to give up in our life to get achievement
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...destructions. It is easy for some people to overcome but it also can be obstacles...
^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o don’t possess persistence and diligent cannot certainly approach what is the mo...
^^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chieved the reputation with the honor of his hard-working invention. Secondly, t...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult of progressive give up. On the other hand, the commitment is the power of the...
^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'twin' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'twins'.
Suggestion: twins
...ng. She is my aunt who has two adorable twin. Owing to her children, she had compari...
^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...she had comparisons between them and her job opportunity. However, she decided to...
^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...ible for both of them. As a result, she possess the fantastic family without financial ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...the key factor of the success is not to loose the momentum and resilience. To sum up...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61583577713 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58596492479 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592375366569 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8890804189 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8421052632 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131291702183 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366885210203 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362955534572 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853031750924 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248647238591 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.