Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the psychology. The articles states that is t factors of human behavior and the lectures is challenged with the opposite views from the author.
To begin with, the author states that psychology is the natural science and illustrate as the chemical and mechanical laws that influence on the brain activities and it can be founded and computed. However, the lecture claims that the psychology is the kind of social science and it is guessed to all mental activities and biology, physical, social habits. In addition, he also states that the psychology is the function of interaction and consciousness.
Secondly, the writer describes the psychology apply the inductive method to calculate general rules from the detail information to require body laws about he humans mind in the laboratory experiment. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes that, for the experiments the psychologists compute the data of human mind by using the quantitative and qualitative method to acquire the format to improve new things.
Finally, the article mentions that the neuroscientists made the research about neutral process in humans and the mental impairment is due to brain damage or disease. The lecture contrasts that the interaction and social behavior are utterly social science and it is the combination of mental activities in the human function and behavior.
To sum up, both the author and the professor argue about the human behavior in psychology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
...re discuss the psychology. The articles states that is t factors of human behavior and...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hology is the kind of social science and it is guessed to all mental activities a...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'about the humans'?
Suggestion: about the humans
...detail information to require body laws about he humans mind in the laboratory experiment. On t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... neuroscientists made the research about neutral process in humans and the mental...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, second, secondly, so, in addition, kind of, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26778242678 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87377346089 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506276150628 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1726063235 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.9 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255254249245 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970701348053 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435232842139 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130956341437 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244943935713 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.